The case against Paul Rubens. A fascinating article raising questions about the definition of child pornography and heralding the "not guilty" verdict that Pee-Wee Herman justly deserves. I'm not quite sure what to say about this article because it challenges a lot of deeply ingrained opinions that I can neither explain nor justify, but it makes a whole hell of a lot of sense and has placed me smack dab in the middle of a philosophical conundrum. An excellent read.